Friday, December 26, 2008
Progress-Related Budget Activities
Via demoinesdem, WaPo on stimulus: "Rep. James L. Oberstar (D-Minn.), chairman of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, has circulated a 41-page memo seeking $85 billion worth of projects over the next two years. The largest chunk of that money, more than $30.2 billion, would go toward highway funds, while $12 billion would go to local public transportation funds. ... Smart-growth advocates are happy that the percentage of funds in Oberstar's proposal devoted to roads is not the 80-20 split in the current highway funding formula, but they still see a system tilting toward old-fashioned projects." And indeed it is. But then again, suburban and rural members outnumber urban members even in the House Democratic caucus, so unless your commuter rail projects go into a number of districts, rail is in trouble. But we're already up to 70-30, and that just Congress's first offer! With a little luck, the White House will want something closer to a 50-50 split, and we can compromise at 60-40, and dare Arlen Specter to vote against the SUPERTRAIN (with Franken winning, we just need one vote in the Senate).
What's funny is that commuter rail doesn't really do anything for city dwellers. In Seattle city dwellers would be better served with funds for tunnelizing the (auto-centric) viaduct than they would be by restoring the interurban trolley line's full glory from Everett to Auburn. But really everyone benefits from transit, even if they drive.
ReplyDeleteA good transit plan should be able to draw congressional support from the 1st, 2nd, 7th, 8th, and 9th, and even the 6th if we built a SUPERFERRY. The 3rd is already doing a lot of mass transit going into stumptown. That leaves Doc Hastings and Cathy Rodgers with no pork, and that's a good thing.