Politicians have done something that benefits the middle class. This is not something to be horrified about! There seems to be some kind of assumption here that government spending is only supposed to be charity for poor, not a way to help everybody. That's a disastrous assumption that nobody interested in advancing human well-being should make. Some services work so that having the government provide them is more efficient. Other services work so that having the government provide them is less efficient. We should be eager to spend government funds on providing services of the former kind, regardless of who's receiving them.
Government-run health care systems are more efficient generally, and Medicaid is no exception. Since Medicaid holds costs down better than private health insurance, it's a step towards getting American health care costs under control. As Paul Krugman says,
since 1970 Medicare costs per beneficiary have risen at an annual rate of 8.8% — but insurance premiums have risen at an annual rate of 9.9%. The rise in Medicare costs is just part of the overall rise in health care spending. And in fact Medicare spending has lagged private spending: if insurance premiums had risen “only” as much as Medicare spending, they’d be 1/3 lower than they are.
And check out the research:
Putting people into Medicaid is a good thing, and it shouldn't stop. If smart Democratic health care wonks in the bowels of some Congressional office are giggling with glee right now about having gotten this into the legislation, I'll be happy to buy them some booze for a party. Schedule it for after we stop Orrin Hatch and company from undoing the good work.
The simulations demonstrate that if people with Medicaid coverage--with their health status, disability, and chronic conditions--were given private coverage, they would cost considerably more than they do today. Conversely, if the privately insured were given Medicaid coverage, spending would be lower.